A free bird leaps
on the back of the wind
and floats downstream
till the current ends
and dips his wing
in the orange sun rays
and dares to claim the sky.But a bird that stalks
down his narrow cage
can seldom see through
his bars of rage
his wings are clipped and
his feet are tied
so he opens his throat to sing.The caged bird sings
with a fearful trill
of things unknown
but longed for still
and his tune is heard
on the distant hill
for the caged bird
sings of freedom.The free bird thinks of another breeze
and the trade winds soft through the sighing trees
and the fat worms waiting on a dawn bright lawn
and he names the sky his ownBut a caged bird stands on the grave of dreams
his shadow shouts on a nightmare scream
his wings are clipped and his feet are tied
so he opens his throat to sing.The caged bird sings
Angelou, Maya. “Caged Bird by Maya Angelou.” Poetry Foundation, Poetry Foundation, http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/48989/caged-bird.
with a fearful trill
of things unknown
but longed for still
and his tune is heard
on the distant hill
for the caged bird
sings of freedom.
I chose this poem purely because of the title. The title did its job in being such a well written hook and drew me in like it does to most readers. The idea of a ‘caged bird’ brings about the idea of something being wrong. Caged has a typically negative connotation, often referring to being held somewhere against that things will. It is being imprisoned or captured, not a situation that most people would like to be put into. The idea of this negative connotation was used perfectly by Angelou. As a history nerd there are many examples of people caging others and Angelou using this to describe the African Americans during the Civil Rights movement was ingenious.
Angelou’s most prominent literary device is rather evident but holds a very heavy affect on the poem as a whole- imagery. Angelou refers to the African American community as the caged bird, the one attempting to escape, while a second bird roam free outside, the White community. Angelou states towards the end of the poem, “But a caged bird stands / on the grave of dreams / his shadow shouts on a nightmare scream / his wings are clipped and his feet are tied / so he opens his throat to sing.” (Angelou 23-26). The bird, evidently trapped and in distress, can do nothing but open its mouth. Angelou is speaking as the entire African American community when she mentions that the community can do nothing but speak. They could not do much in terms of proper actions as that was just how things were. They were forced to resort to using their words and rallying together to make a difference.
That is the message that Angelou is then trying to make clear anyone reading her poem. As the last line of her poem states, “for the caged bird / sings of freedom.” (Angelou 37-38. Freedom is all they can work towards, and with their words is all they have. The entire poem is about only being able to speak up, but using those few words to make such a different. It is a beautiful poem about finding identity and Angelou is absolutely validated to write about this. It is also ironic as it refers back to how she went mute as a child and is now using words as her weapon. It is a delicately written poem that embraces exactly what it wishes to and speaks the words the bird sings, words of freedom.
I completely agree with you that Angelou’s most effective literary device is her imagery. Using this imagery to describe the caged and free birds better sets up the juxtaposition that her messages hinges on. In addition, the metaphor of the free and caged birds representing the white and black communities is very powerful given the historical context of which the poem was written. Maya Angelou is definitely very qualified to write about this issue given her own experiences, something you incorporated well in you analysis. I thought you could have done a better job touching on the repetition of the lines “so he opens his throat to sing” and “signs of freedom”. Overall, very well done.
LikeLike
Thank you so much, it means a lot that you agree with me. I think you are absolutely right though, I just jumped into the poem and jumped over the first part. Your analysis on the first part is nice and thank you for pointing it out. A very integral part of the poem is the comparison of the free bird and the caged bird. The repetition of the lines of having to sing while caged up help emphasize the idea of only being able to sing. Thank you for your analysis, this really helps.
LikeLike